![]() Ticket orders from the zoo are from Try searching for that sender in your inbox. If you notice that you haven’t received your emailed ticket order yet, try the following. What do I do?Īfter an online purchase, guests should receive their ticket order via email within a few hours. Scroll down further to the Drive-Through FAQs for this pricing and informationģ. during Walk-Through Eventsĭrive-through event tickets are sold by the vehicle. The Box Office is not open during Drive-Through nights. In-person tickets can be purchased on the same day at the box office for $25 each or a 4-pack for $75. The advance ticket discounted cost on walk-through evenings for Zoo members is $19 and $22 for non-members, or a 4-pack for $60 for Zoo members and $70 for non-members.Īdvance online ticket sales end at 5:30 p.m. on the same day as the event. Save on tickets when you purchase in advance. Regular Zoo admission hours are 10 a.m. - 5 p.m. and does not provide entry to Asian Lantern Festival. You must exit the Zoo by 5 p.m. and re-enter at 6:30 p.m. under a separate ticket for Asian Lantern Festival. ![]() Thousands of lanterns are placed across several destinations of the Zoo including the Welcome Plaza, African Savanna, Wilderness Trek, Asian Highlands, Waterfowl Lake and more. Does a ticket to Asian Lantern Festival also provide entry to the Zoo?Īsian Lantern Festival is a separate ticketed event that provides entry to the Zoo when the event begins at 6:30 p.m. each night. Cleveland attorneys note in the lawsuit they became aware of Pittsburgh’s event June 22.Asian Lantern Festival - General FAQs for Walk-Through and Drive-Through Datesġ. Petersburg predated the Cleveland zoo event by a year.Īttorneys for the Pittsburgh zoo also claim the Cleveland zoo filed its federal trademark application - for “Asian Lantern Festival Cleveland Metroparks Zoo” - three days before filing the lawsuit on July 2. The filing points to light shows with the phrase “Asian Lantern Festival” at zoos across the country: Louisville Zoo, the Central Florida Zoo and Botanical Gardens, and the Blank Park Zoo in Iowa. In its own filing, Pittsburgh zoo representatives called the lawsuit an “audacious attempt to claim intellectual property rights,” noting the phrase Asian Lantern Festival has been used to describe events and traditions that have existed “for over two millennia.” The lawsuit alleges Pittsburgh’s use of the name Asian Lantern Festival is “likely to cause confusion, cause mistake and deceive consumers as to the source, origin, affiliation, connection or association of the Pittsburgh zoo’s light show.” The lawsuit claims the Pittsburgh zoo’s advertisements are using photos from the Cleveland zoo’s lantern festival. “At no time,” according to the lawsuit, “did Cleveland Metroparks authorize Pittsburgh zoo to use the Asian Lantern Festival mark.” It further claims that Pittsburgh began advertising its light show at the same time tickets for the Cleveland show opened ticket sales. It is billed as the Asian Lantern Festival and referred to as “a bold new adventure” for the zoo. 30, according to the Pittsburgh zoo’s website. The show is scheduled for certain days from Aug. The lawsuit alleges that staff from the Pittsburgh zoo visited the lantern festival in Cleveland in 2020 to “determine whether Pittsburgh Zoo would like to host a light show of its own.” Pittsburgh zoo officials contracted with the same company, Tianyu Arts and Culture, to present a light show in Pittsburgh. In a lawsuit filed earlier this month, officials for the Cleveland zoo alleged the Pittsburgh festival is a ripoff of the Cleveland zoo’s annual event, which has been a staple at the park since 2018. “The good news,” Middleman said, “is that residents and visitors to both Pittsburgh and Cleveland will be able to experience a world-class, culturally enriching event in each city.” The zoo in Cleveland - officially the Cleveland Metropolitan Park District, and known as Cleveland Metroparks - had sought to have the Pittsburgh zoo barred from advertising the upcoming Asian Lantern Festival. “This ruling is certainly encouraging and a positive step for the Pittsburgh zoo, which is now able to continue with all marketing and advertising efforts for its upcoming Asian Lantern Festival without encumbrance,” said Ray Middleman, of the law firm Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott. ![]() District Judge James Gwin denied the motion late last week, something attorneys for Pittsburgh Zoo & PPG Aquarium called good news. A federal judge in Ohio has denied the Cleveland zoo’s request for a temporary restraining order against the Pittsburgh zoo over alleged trademark infringement related to the Pittsburgh zoo’s upcoming Asian Lantern Festival.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |